I know a lady who has a one month old daughter and an eighteen month old son. She has her groceries delivered, though it costs a little more. No meltdowns in the produce section, no fussing with car seats in the pouring down rain. No having to pull over and produce a bottle or two lest the heavens be sundered by audible evidence of infantile hunger pangs.
Another friend reads a lot of library books but hasn’t been inside the actual library building since “before the pandemic.”
As a warp nine introvert, I need a lot of solitude. Being around people, even my favorite people in the whole world, saps my energy. And yet, solitude can become isolation, and that–for me–has downsides. When I don’t have to make small talk at the post office, when I no longer know the check-out staff at my fave grocery store by name, when the simple courtesy of holding the door for somebody carrying packages isn’t part of my day… I lose both a sense of connection to my local community and opportunities to casually accommodate that community.
If the postal clerk speaks with an accent, I have to exert myself to listen more carefully. If the checkout lady wants to maunder on about her son in Alaska, I expect myself to offer some empathy for a parent whose only child is so far away. If I let the door slam on somebody carrying too many packages, I will feel remorse for my obliviousness to a stranger’s situation. I must, in other words, accommodate agendas other than my own, and do so as graciously as possible, because I need those people to be gracious toward me as well.
To the extent screens preserve us from the inconvenience of in-person encounters in our various village squares, screens might also be making it easier for us to dehumanize, ignore, and resent one another. Screen addiction might make it very easy to divide us from people with whom we really have much in common. This has been one of my pet theories, at least, when confronted with one of my siblings foghorning about how technology keeps us all so wonderfully connected.
I read this issue of Dense Discovery and got some insight into how my sibling and I might both be right. The jist of the newsletter and the article it cites is: Screens make it possible to stay in touch with the people we’re already close to–friends and family–
and to feel connected to genuine strangers (Taylor Swift, Benedict Cumberbatch), but screens cut out that middle orbital of neighbors, casual acquaintances, and “repetitive strangers,” like the checkout ladies and Tuesday morning library patrons.
That middle band of acquaintance is where we learn tolerance, and where we get a sense of belonging not to a family or a gym, but to a society. It’s where we turn for our next good friends, and where we sometimes must turn in emergencies. The middle ground matters, in other words, and we might well be losing it to screens.
So this is me, thinking about ways to put down the screens and go for a walk, shop in person, or visit the actual, wonderful library. Are there activities you could do on a screen but prefer to handle in person? Activities you will NEVER allow into the virtual realm?
PS: For those out weeding the geraniums, enjoying the fresh air, or planning that summer vacay… Lord Julian’s ninth mystery, A Gentleman of Questionable Judgment, has officially hit the shelves!





As I was growing up, my family did not take vacations. Logistics were an issue. How do you get nine people and all their luggage into one car? How do you stop World War III from breaking out in the way-back of the station wagon? Once the big kids peeled out of formation, we did spend some summers in San Diego while my dad took sabbatical leave at UCSD or Scripps.
Why is this on my mind? Because I am happy to report that Lord Julian’s tenth tale, A Gentleman in Possession of Secrets, is complete in draft. Yay, yippee, yahoo, and gaudeamus igitur! This moment in the writing process, when the manuscript is complete in draft, is nonetheless always a little fraught for me. On the one hand, I feel great relief. I know once I have the first draft, I can make a book out of it. Phew!
That maybe, for a couple of weeks or so, I am NOT supposed to write, strikes me as preposterous. Writing is what I do. I am a writer. I love to write. The idea that I will create better books if I focus instead on my flower beds right now feels like blasphemy and darned risky. To suggest that I will come up with a really interesting pair of protagonists if I test ride some lease horses. (Did I just write that!?) feels absurd.
I’m pretty good a micro-indulgences, like the perfect cup of tea, a bouquet of yard flowers, or good book, but I have fallen out of the habit of travel to Scotland or Ireland, big writing retreats, or transcontinental road trips. The pandemic has something to do with my narrowed appetite for rejuvenation, but looking at my parents, I suspect the Depression, the Potato Famine and even the
I thought the songbirds were swerving my property because I have a lot of cats. Or maybe bird flu got here a while ago and we’re only just noticing it. Maybe I stopped hearing the birdies first thing in the day because migration patterns are changing due to light pollution and loss of habitat.
The hearing aids are an adjustment–they make my own voice louder, so I’m tending to speak too softly. I’ll get over that, and I’ll learn which settings work best for which environments. They are uncomfortable, but I’m assured the discomfort fades with regular use. I might need child-sized devices, which we can sort out if necessary.
Recent
I bash for-greed medicine all the time, and these hearing aids were very, very expensive. But they work reasonably well, they are not obvious to the casual observer, and they gave me back the time of the singing birds and the music of my little rural stream. I am beyond grateful that I could afford them (for now), and every time I step outside–to take out the trash, to fetch the groceries from the car–I hear the birds singing, and I have a reason to stop and simply rejoice.
As an undergraduate at Penn State, I became involved with the campus newspaper, The Daily Collegian. Our newsroom was housed in the Carnegie Building, a venerable old relic from the early 1900s. I never gave much thought to the building’s name, figured it had something to do with Andrew Carnegie, who was a Rich Guy who lived Back When.
Fast forward a few decades and I’ve just finished a biography of Andrew Carnegie, who was, in his day… the richest man in the world, richer by far than the oligarchs we have underfoot these days. He was the son of a Scottish weaver put out of work by technical advances in loom design. The family emigrated to Pittsburgh in 1848, where they had friends and relatives already established in the United States.
But at the age of thirty-seven, Carnegie stepped away from active business. He turned over his companies to managers, he started looking for a buyer for what would become his U.S. Steel stock (John Pierpont Morgan took the bait many years later), and he began giving away enormous sums of money. He made it his public mission to give away staggering sums, funding all manner of public and academic libraries, technical schools, university posts, museums, and “Hero Funds,” to support the survivors of those who’d lost their lives trying to save others.
This book did not sit well with me, in part because Carnegie was so contradictory. Maybe fiction writing and reading–or the news trying to impersonate entertainment?– has conditioned me to look for characters who fit into simple functional roles–protagonist, sidekick, mentor, antagonist. But I was also struck by the fact that this one small man (5 foot 3) was worth much more than any of our present day oligarchs in constant dollars, and he chose to use his wealth to found more than 1700 libraries in North America alone. One of his charitable foundations was responsible for the grant that resulted in Sesame Street and the Children’s Television Workshop.
I have plowed my way into what I call a compression phase, when the to-do’s pile up, the unforeseen must-do’s crowd in, and it’s an especially good idea (and hard) to stay organized. I knew I was ramping up efforts in the certified therapeutic riding instructor direction, and I knew I had teaching-how-to-write gigs in early April and late May. (I am not at all sure how I ended up with book releases back to back in
All of which is to say, things are busy, and except for the bug I caught, busy in a pretty good way. I’m doing the stuff I love to do (writing first thing most days; the occasional lunch with writing, horsing, or life buddies; ending each day with good reading). The yard work is something I used to do and can enjoy again, now that I have the right tools. The instructor certification process has taught me a lot and put me in the company of wonderful horses and great people.
Stuff like: Linger in the shower for an extra couple minutes. Pick a bouquet of yard flowers for the bathroom. Have one of those cups of tea just sitting on the porch steps talking to the cats. Stop at the battlefield overlook on your way home from lunch and just breathe for a few minutes. Post something that encourages another writer (because when we are kind, WE feel empowered, and well we should).
To earn the therapeutic riding instructor certification I’m pursuing takes a lot of steps. One requirement is for volunteer hours at a certified therapeutic riding facility, another is student teaching hours. You must also spend time demonstrating your knowledge of horse care for both well and unwell horses. A first aid certification figures early in the process as does a test of professional standards applicable to the discipline.
Blah, blah, blah, and the video cannot be edited in any manner. You either nail this video, or you are denied permission to take the final tests. No pressure.
I felt kinda slapped up side the head. He was thinking of thank yous, I was thinking of my next heartfelt bellyache. At another point in our discussions, he mentioned that he’d bought a bottle of champagne to open when he completed all of his pre-final test requirements.
I forget where I came across this idea, but it has been on my mind lately: We are wired to value what we suffer for. This aspect of human psychology is at least in part behind hazing, boot camp, most fitness programs, freshman weeder courses, and the practice of sending young people on evangelical missions. If you spend 18-24 months having doors slammed in your face, living on a shoestring, homesick, and subjected to rigid social strictures, you are set up to conclude that the inspiration for all those miseries must be a pretty worthy part of life.
In my life, I can certainly see the “if I’m suffering for this cause, it must be worthy” mechanism at work in parenting. Nothing wrung me out emotionally, physically, or financially, like being a single mom. I don’t think I have another slog like that in me, not for any motivation on this earth… except maybe my grand kids? I got caught up in the same rip tide, though, with child welfare lawyering.
What has been puzzling me lately is that this dynamic–if I’m suffering for it, it must be a worthy relationship/institution/cause–typically pops up in precisely the areas where maintaining some objective judgment, or keeping a healthy boundary, is particularly important. We suffer for family, for the company that employs us, for the church that never seems to have enough volunteers or money, no matter what its bank balance is or how many seemingly not-so-busy people attend services.
I know the pandemic is truly in the rear view mirror because writers are starting to get together for conferences again. Not the monster cons of yore, which only about twenty venues in the whole country could accommodate, but nice little get togethers at the retreat or single-hotel level.
Regency history. We talked and talked, about the parallels between the Regency’s notorious
American life in general, are good places to pass the time with strangers. Six days a week, most of us either work or worship with the same people. Americans also don’t have a “local,” a watering hole that’s part club part hideout.
Welp, I did not get those energizer bunny genes. I (and I alone in my family) got the genes that make me a champion sitter-downer. Younger authors ask me the secret to my productivity and I want to say to them, “I have a natural capacity for physical sloth.” It helps that I like words too, though truly, my mother could not have endured the amount of sitting I do to get a book written.
So I have to be cagey about coaxing myself out of my writing chair. “C’mon, Grace. You just wrote a great rough draft of a scene. Lunch time has come and gone. Time to go for a toddle!”
“You did it. You got up and boogied, and this is wonderful of you. But you know, it’s only a couple more telephone poles to the bottom of the hill, and it is downhill, and there’s no headwind. Why not just do a couple more telephone poles?”
My property is bounded on two sides by good old farm country hedgerows. These innocuous looking strips of trees and bushes want you to think they will mind their own business, century after century, but that’s a flaming falsehood. Hedgerows are after world domination. Just leave one unattended for two years, and you’ll see the evidence.
Yard guy quotes me big thousands to a) remove 270 feet of still-functional three-board oak fence and haul it away, b) bring in huge tree-eating equipment and reduce all unwanted specimens to sawdust (while alas, also killing my two baby apple trees), and c) rebuilding the fence with new materials.
I read the power saw manual (with a magnifying glass), fired up the saw, and got to work. Within about twenty minutes, I was thinking maybe I could manage a larger saw. I have repulsed the invading saplings, cut the poison ivy off at that roots, freed the fence of dropped branches, and generally given the hedgerow’s nefarious aspirations a middle finger. And when a tree dropped on the fence this week, I called the guy who tills my garden, and he knew a guy who knew a guy, and the mess was cleaned up for a modest price the next afternoon.